Not too long ago the leftist faction of America’s
mantra was “honor diversity”. My
understanding of that was that all lifestyles, points of view and choices were
to be “honored”. Turns out they weren’t
serious.
Today I read an article that said that if I didn’t jump on the gay marriage bandwagon I’d be on the wrong side of history. What? Why do I give a baboon’s butt about how history will judge me? I’m not a public figure; I’m a middle-aged guy living in the suburbs. I don’t want to join the hive, nor do I think I should have to. I want to simply live my life based on my values. Apparently, that’s not possible in our current age. Because by living as I always have, I’ve suddenly become an enemy. To whom? To every “right thinking” person in America, if the media is to be believed. See, that’s the part that bothers me. The media, as the propaganda arm of extremists on both sides, is using massive peer pressure to get their point across. Everyone’s doing it, and if you don’t you’ll be square. Of course, they don’t say “square”, they use phrases like “the wrong side of history”, “unenlightened” and “bigoted”. Funny, but ten years ago I, as well as the vast majority of this country, had the same opinion that I currently hold and none of these epithets were tossed about.
Today I read an article that said that if I didn’t jump on the gay marriage bandwagon I’d be on the wrong side of history. What? Why do I give a baboon’s butt about how history will judge me? I’m not a public figure; I’m a middle-aged guy living in the suburbs. I don’t want to join the hive, nor do I think I should have to. I want to simply live my life based on my values. Apparently, that’s not possible in our current age. Because by living as I always have, I’ve suddenly become an enemy. To whom? To every “right thinking” person in America, if the media is to be believed. See, that’s the part that bothers me. The media, as the propaganda arm of extremists on both sides, is using massive peer pressure to get their point across. Everyone’s doing it, and if you don’t you’ll be square. Of course, they don’t say “square”, they use phrases like “the wrong side of history”, “unenlightened” and “bigoted”. Funny, but ten years ago I, as well as the vast majority of this country, had the same opinion that I currently hold and none of these epithets were tossed about.
I’m not “progressive”, nor have I ever wanted to be. I’m also not buying into the Tea Party
line. I don’t feel the need to belong to
either camp. I've never been an "in crowd" kind of a guy. Besides, being cool pretty much
stopped being an option when I lost my hair.
(But, of course, that’s now a “disease” with a cure, rather than part of
being a man. A modern man has a full
head of product packed hair and not another occupied follicle on the rest of
his body. When I was young, that
condition was called “pre-pubescent”.)
My bald head spins when I hear people who claim to be “free-thinkers” or
“defenders of family values” tell me where to eat my chicken. Really?
Now I need to check in with the collective mind before I go out to
lunch? If that’s the point we’ve arrived
at as a nation, we’re all out to lunch.
In 1980 I was 19 and excited to be voting in my first
presidential election. Jimmy Carter had
proven his incompetence and it was time for a real president to take over. I went to the voting place and proudly cast
my vote for Ronald Reagan. Afterward, at
dinner, I got into a fairly heated discussion with my girlfriend’s
grandmother. (Yes, I was a rude punk.) She had voted for the
independent candidate, John Anderson.
The basis of my argument was that it was a foregone conclusion that
Reagan was going to win, so why throw away your vote? History proved me right as Ronald Reagan won
in a landslide. The problem is, I
couldn’t have been more wrong. Voting,
like morals, isn’t a horse race where we’re trying to pick the winner. It’s a declaration of our deepest held
beliefs. Can those opinions change over
time? Of course. But, they change based on how our personal
experiences mold our convictions, not because some
imbecile on the internet, talking head on the TV or ranting voice on the radio
says it’s time to think differently.
When Hitler needed an enemy to rally his cause, he chose the
Jews. They had been living peacefully
and contributing to their communities for many years when, suddenly, they
became enemies of the state. This was
done through a combination of propaganda and government programs. Recently public officials in Boston
and Chicago
have indicated that they would block a private business because they don’t like
the political views of the owner. How is
this different from the Jim Crow laws?
It’s one thing when blowhards on MSNBC, Fox News, or AM radio
are pontificating. But, when it goes
from citizens expressing their opinions to government leaders exercising their
influence, a line has been crossed into very dangerous territory.